cplusplus.com 有什么问题? [关闭] - What's wrong with cplusplus.com? [closed]

10/14 14:38
阅读数 0

问题:

Closed . 关闭 This question is opinion-based . 这个问题是基于意见的 It is not currently accepting answers. 它目前不接受答案。

Want to improve this question?想改善这个问题吗? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post .更新问题,以便通过编辑这篇文章用事实和引文来回答问题。

Closed 8 days ago . 8 天前关闭。

This is perhaps not a perfectly suitable forum for this question, but let me give it a shot, at the risk of being moved away.对于这个问题,这可能不是一个完全合适的论坛,但让我试一试,冒着被移走的风险。

There are several references for the C++ standard library, including the invaluable ISO standard, MSDN , IBM , cppreference , and cplusplus . C++ 标准库有多个参考资料,包括无价的 ISO 标准、 MSDNIBMcppreferencecplusplus Personally, when writing C++ I need a reference that has quick random access, short load times and usage examples, and I've been finding cplusplus.com pretty useful.就我个人而言,在编写 C++ 时,我需要一个具有快速随机访问、短加载时间和使用示例的参考,而且我发现 cplusplus.com 非常有用。 However, I've been hearing negative opinions about that website frequently here on SO, so I would like to get specific:但是,我经常在 SO 上听到对该网站的负面评价,所以我想具体说明一下:

What are the errors, misconceptions or bad pieces of advice given by cplusplus.com? cplusplus.com 给出的错误、误解或不好的建议是什么? What are the risks of using it to make coding decisions?使用它来做出编码决策有哪些风险?

Let me add this point: I want to be able to answer questions here on SO with accurate quotes of the standard, and thus I would like to post immediately-usable links, and cplusplus.com would have been my choice site were it not for this issue.让我补充一点:我希望能够用准确的标准引用来回答 SO 上的问题,因此我想发布立即可用的链接,如果不是 cplusplus.com,我会选择它这个问题。


解决方案:

参考一: https://en.stackoom.com/question/RMA8
参考二: https://stackoom.com/question/RMA8
展开阅读全文
打赏
0
0 收藏
分享
加载中
更多评论
打赏
0 评论
0 收藏
0
分享
返回顶部
顶部